RAG Knowledge Assistant for Internal Teams
RAG assistant trained on contracts, SOPs, policies, and project history with citations and access control.
Production AI agents, RAG systems, document intelligence, LLM applications, evaluation, guardrails, and integration — built to work in real operations, not just demos.
Production-grade AI software with real business logic, integrations, and engineering maturity behind it.
AI Business Agents — Autonomous agents that execute multi-step business processes: support triage, claims processing, back-office operations, and internal workflow automation.
RAG Knowledge Assistants — Retrieval-augmented generation systems with citations and role-based access. Query contracts, manuals, reports, and knowledge bases in plain language.
Document Intelligence — Classification, extraction, validation, and routing of invoices, contracts, forms, and clinical records — replacing slow manual data-entry pipelines.
LLM Product Features — AI capabilities embedded inside existing SaaS and enterprise software through a controlled integration and architecture layer.
Evaluation & Guardrails — Evaluation harnesses, model routing, cost control, and guardrail design for AI systems already in production or preparing for it.
Private-Cloud & On-Premise AI — Sensitive-data workflows deployed on private cloud or on-premise infrastructure with appropriate access controls and audit logging.
A production AI system combines deterministic software and probabilistic models. Both layers need to be designed, tested, and monitored correctly.
Controls identity, authorisation, business rules, data access, audit logging, and actions. Deterministic — no AI guessing here.
Handles language understanding, generation, extraction, ranking, and summarisation. Probabilistic — needs measurement and monitoring.
RAG pipelines, embeddings, chunking, re-ranking, and context management for grounded, accurate, and citable outputs.
Representative test cases, acceptance thresholds, failure tracking, and regression testing before every model or prompt change.
Latency, cost, accuracy, error rates, and drift monitoring. Alerting on business-logic failures, not only infrastructure failures.
Confidence thresholds, escalation paths, approval queues, and fallback rules — so the system knows when to ask, not just when to act.
Before writing a line of production code, a proper AI engineering engagement defines scope, constraints, and success criteria precisely enough to evaluate the result — and to stop a project that shouldn't proceed.
Start with a discovery callA clearly defined business process and measurable target outcome.
Access constraints, sensitivity classification, and retention rules documented before architecture decisions.
Representative test cases and acceptance thresholds agreed before build begins.
Architecture options, cost drivers, integration approach, and operating model in one clear document.
Production AI systems delivered for clients in insurance, healthcare, professional services, and enterprise operations.
RAG assistant trained on contracts, SOPs, policies, and project history with citations and access control.
LLM-based intake assistant that reads emails, extracts claim data, checks policy context, and drafts structured summaries for human review.
Secure processing of medical records, lab files, and referral forms with RAG search, schema-based extraction, and validation rules.
CRM, email, documents, and approval flows connected into a unified automation layer with AI-generated task summaries.
Book a discovery call with an AI engineering expert. We'll map your use case, define the architecture, and scope a controlled pilot — no overcommitment on day one.
It can include use-case discovery, data assessment, architecture, model selection, RAG, agent workflows, evaluation, security, integration, deployment, observability, and optimization.
Model choice should be based on task quality, data sensitivity, latency, cost, context requirements, deployment constraints, and evaluation results rather than brand preference.
Deterministic software controls permissions, business rules, state changes, validation, audit logs, and transactions. The AI component should not silently bypass these controls.
Use representative test cases, expected outcomes, failure categories, accuracy or task-success metrics, latency, cost, safety checks, and human review of ambiguous cases.
Yes. The safest approach usually starts with a bounded workflow and an integration layer rather than rebuilding the full product around AI.